Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing · Texas

Schertz Texas Plant

Schertz, TX · ~29 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schertz Texas Plant runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Schertz Texas Plant: 4.0 TCR = 123% of Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schertz Texas Plant safety composite

Schertz Texas Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Schertz Texas Plant: 3.5 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.66× in 2024

Schertz Texas Plant's TCR rose 6.6 from 3.5 in 2016 to 10.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Schertz, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 123% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #103/161
  • PHOTO Group Dekko Avilla
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Group Dekko Avilla (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Schertz Texas Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schertz Texas Plant averages 4.0 TCR (123% of the Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schertz Texas Plant TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=3 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=10.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Schertz Texas Plant falls in its industry

2,838 Motor vehicle moldings and ext establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 161 Motor vehicle moldings and ext employers in Texas.

Schertz Texas Plant (29 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Schertz Texas Plant
Schertz Texas Plant (29 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Schertz Texas Plant has fewer employees than the Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.1 6.7 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2020 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2017 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · TX · Schertz

2,838 Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 95 employers in Schertz, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Group Dekko Avilla 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silgan Dispensing Systems Thomaston 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Labcon, North America 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milgard Windows and Doors Sacramento 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mondelez Global Gulf South - Sales 1,403 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mondelez Global Mountain South - Sales 1,300 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SAT1 1,098 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAT1 867 FTE
NAT-TCR Division 40 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bodensteinter Implement Company - Elkader Location 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Advantage Tank Lines 20051 Louisville 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bucyrus 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Majestic View Dairy 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt Sc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittsburg Sc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ong Wr Shawnee Sc 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.