Demolition contractor · New Hampshire

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition

Name: Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Portsmouth, NH · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.3
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Demolition contractor workplace, earning a grade C.

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition: 2.3 TCR = 80% of Demolition contractor BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition safety composite

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−56.7

2017→2018

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition injury rate improved

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition's TCR fell 56.7 from 58.9 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 58.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=58.9 · 2018=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Portsmouth, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 80% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #6/16
PHOTO Ross Construction Inc
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ross Construction Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.3
Ross Construct

2.3
Reno (101)

2.3
1

2.3
Landis & Landi

2.3

What this shows Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition averages 2.3 TCR (80% of the Demolition contractor BLS benchmark).

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition TCR series: 2017=58.9 · 2018=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition falls in its industry

1,750 Demolition contractor establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 16 Demolition contractor employers in New Hampshire.

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition (31 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Schiller Mercury Power Station Demolition has fewer employees than the Demolition contractor median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	2.3	0.0	1	0	0
2017	58.9	48.5	3	14	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · NH · Portsmouth

1,750 Demolition contractor employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 119 employers in Portsmouth, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Ross Construction Inc	AUSTIN, TX	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Reno (101)	RENO, NV	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	1	OPELIKA, AL	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Landis & Landis Construction	WEST LINN, OR	2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Eversource - Manchester Elm St	MANCHESTER	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Academy	RINDGE	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Electrical Installations, Inc.	MOULTONBORO	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Amherst Insulation & Firestop Service, Inc.	MANCHESTER	31 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lonza Portsmouth	Portsmouth	1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Portsmouth Regional Hospital	Portsmouth	1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR	LDRM Visa Support Services NVC-DTSV	Portsmouth	339 FTE
CITY-NEAR	LDRM Visa Support Services NVC-LWH	Portsmouth	330 FTE
NAT-TCR	Elzinga & Volkers Inc.	Holland, MI	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Luna Energy Facility	Deming, NM	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Port City Custom Plastics, Mirror Image Tool and Port City Group Corporate	Muskegon, MI	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Baytown, Texas	Baytown, TX	2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Leaf River Ag Service	Wadena, MN	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Council Bluffs Branch	Council Bluffs, IA	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Wiles Bros. Fertilizer, Inc.	Plattsmouth, NE	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Safety Administration/Accident Tracking	Celina, OH	31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.