Panelboards, electric power distribution, manufacturing · Pennsylvania
Schneider Electric
Leesport, PA · ~312 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.7
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Schneider Electric runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Panelboards, electric power distribution, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 6
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Schneider Electric's OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.7 to the Panelboards, electric power distribution, manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (20% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Schneider Electric's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Schneider Electric falls in its industry
255 Panelboards, electric power di establishmentsSafer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.
Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 23 Panelboards, electric power di employers in Pennsylvania.
Trend analysis for Schneider Electric
Between 2016 and 2018, Schneider Electric's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 0.6 to 0.7 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 5% increase across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 0.6, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 0.7, a spread of 0.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 3 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 3 reporting years, Schneider Electric recorded 6 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 6 injuries shown on this page for Schneider Electric are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 335313 - Panelboards, electric power distribution, manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 619,302 hours worked = 0.32 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Schneider Electric (this establishment) | 0.65 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Control panels, electric power distribution, manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 335313 |
| Pennsylvania state avg (all industries) | 5.06 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Schneider Electric to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Schneider Electric's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Panelboards, electric power distribution, manufacturing peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 20% of the Panelboards, electric power distribution, manufacturing benchmark, Schneider Electric reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Panelboards, electric power distribution, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Schneider Electric's safety grade?
How many injuries has Schneider Electric reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Pennsylvania, and by nearby establishments in Leesport - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~0.7)
Similar size (~312 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.