LUMBERYARD-NEW MATERIALS ONLY-ALL OTHER EMLOYEES · Texas

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc.

Houston, TX · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical LUMBERYARD-NEW MATERIALS ONLY-ALL OTHER EMLOYEES workplace, earning a grade F.

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc.: 5.1 TCR = 231% of LUMBERYARD-NEW MATERIALS ONLY-ALL OTHER EMLOYEES BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. safety composite

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2018→2024

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.7 from 5.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.7 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.1 · 231% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #97/149
  • PHOTO FG YUMA
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FG YUMA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. averages 5.1 TCR (231% of the LUMBERYARD-NEW MATERIALS ONLY-ALL OTHER EMLOYEES BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2018=5.7 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

1,225 LUMBERYARD-NEW MATERIALS ONLY- establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 149 LUMBERYARD-NEW MATERIALS ONLY- employers in Texas.

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. (37 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Scholl Forest Industries, Inc.
Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. (37 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Scholl Forest Industries, Inc. has fewer employees than the LUMBERYARD-NEW MATERIALS ONLY-ALL OTHER median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 8.9 6.7 4 0 0
2021 10.4 7.8 4 0 0
2020 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 5.7 5.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · TX · Houston

1,225 LUMBERYARD-NEW MATERIALS ONLY-ALL OTHER EMLOYEES employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FG YUMA 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building Supply Main- Powder Springs 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2704-W JORDAN READY-FRAME PANEL 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edmund A. Allen Lumber, Illinois Facility 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fannin Growing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyland Grain, LLC- Spearman Gin 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alura Cogen 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Arden Courts of Livonia 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kimball 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Boysen USA Alabama, LLC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pyrotechnic Specialties Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Coatings, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Plastics Plus 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE JC Sons Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rural Hall Operations Center 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.