Roofing contractors · Texas

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock

Lubbock, TX · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock: 0.6 TCR = 23% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock safety composite

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock held a steady TCR band

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Lubbock, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/98
  • PHOTO Aderhold Roofing Cor…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aderhold Roofing Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock averages 0.6 TCR (23% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 98 Roofing contractors employers in Texas.

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock (30 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock
Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock (30 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock has fewer employees than the Roofing contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · TX · Lubbock

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 482 employers in Lubbock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aderhold Roofing Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAW St. Louis Office 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Roofing 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nations Roof of IL 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRAZOS RIVER SOD FARM 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feeders LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dimmitt Feedyard 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR A01 Covenant Medical Center 3,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-20049000 2,269 FTE
CITY-NEAR FALCON HEALTHCARE INC DBA INTERIM HEALTHCARE 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Health System 1,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Scaffold Solutions Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Code 3 Services, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Primetals Alpharetta 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR EMD Millipore - 80 Ashby and 75 Wiggins 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heritage Oaks 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4 Track Systems dba StyleLine Windows dba Porch Conversions - Ohio Location 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Zionsville, Town Hall 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Air and Refrigeration, LLC 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.