Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing · Georgia

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc

Winder, GA · ~180 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc safety composite

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc: 1.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2023

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.0 in 2019 to 1.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Winder, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #32/103
  • PHOTO Molded Fiber Glass R…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Molded Fiber Glass Research (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schuetz Container Systems, Inc averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc TCR series: 2019=1 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Schuetz Container Systems, Inc falls in its industry

2,838 Drums, plastics (i.e., contain establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 103 Drums, plastics (i.e., contain employers in Georgia.

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc (180 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Schuetz Container Systems, Inc
Schuetz Container Systems, Inc (180 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Schuetz Container Systems, Inc has more employees than the Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.4 0.5 2 1 0
2022 2.9 1.3 7 0 0
2021 2.7 2.0 3 1 0
2020 1.9 0.0 3 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · GA · Winder

2,838 Drums, plastics (i.e., containers), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 57 employers in Winder, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Molded Fiber Glass Research 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORBIS Bardstown 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SKWI01-NMC-MPM - MONROE 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Insulfab Plastics, Inc. SC Division 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Savannah Operating 3102 Kilowatt Dr Savannah 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid-South Roof Systems 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reid & Reid Construction LLC 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oakcrest Lumber Inc. 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chico's Distribution, Inc. 617 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carvana Winder 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chico's Distribution Services, LLC (DC-2) 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winder Price Industries 384 FTE
NAT-TCR Lane Aviation Corp 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rose Construction, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sebastopol Processing 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rohrer Corporation - Addison Facility 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Abby Vans Inc. 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Specialty chemical and personal care cosmetics manufacturing 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pb Fasteners 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Miramar 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.