Shoe (except bowling, golf, spiked) stores · Minnesota

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile

Saint Louis Park, MN · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Shoe (except bowling, golf, spiked) stores workplace, earning a grade D.

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile: 4.6 TCR = 135% of Shoe (except bowling, golf, spiked) stores BLS 3.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile safety composite

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2018→2020

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile injury rate improved

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile's TCR fell 9.0 from 9.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.0 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 448210 · Saint Louis Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 135% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Schuler Shoes - Rose…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schuler Shoes - Roseville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile averages 4.6 TCR (135% of the Shoe (except bowling, golf, spiked) stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile TCR series: 2018=9 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile falls in its industry

16 Shoe (except bowling, golf, sp establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Shoe (except bowling, golf, sp employers in Minnesota.

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile (21 employees, TCR 4.6) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shoe Palace CorporationSchuler Shoes - RosevilleLehigh Outfitters, LLCVans Distribution Center - CoronaFinish Line Corporate OfficeSchuler Shoes - WoodburySchuler Shoes - OfficeSkechersSchuler Shoes - Miracle Mile
Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile (21 employees, TCR 4.6) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Schuler Shoes - Miracle Mile has fewer employees than the Shoe (except bowling, golf, spiked) stor median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2018 9.0 9.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

448210 · MN · Saint Louis Park

16 Shoe (except bowling, golf, spiked) stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 33 employers in Saint Louis Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schuler Shoes - Roseville 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shoe Palace Corporation 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schuler Shoes - Wayzata 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Airport Way Danner Factory Store 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Winthrop Agronomy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donahues Greenhouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE M7 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNLOG-SEL-SEL MN LOGISTICS' 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Louis Park Methodist Hosp 2,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Louis Park 3800 Bldg 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Louis Pk Specialty Ctr 6500 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Louis Pk Specialty Ctr 3931 441 FTE
NAT-TCR 0000000023 Quickchek Food Stores 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR REN007 Wilkes-Barre 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Uihlein Electric 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR St Francis Health LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Salem SM 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 11 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tulsa Harvard TH 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tyler TY 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.