Microwave components manufacturing · New York

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits

Brooklyn, NY · ~135 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Microwave components manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Microwave components manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits safety composite

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2020→2021

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits injury rate improved

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.4 in 2020 to 0.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.4 · 2021=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Brooklyn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #9/28
  • PHOTO Hayward Quartz Techn…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hayward Quartz Technology, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Microwave components manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits TCR series: 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits falls in its industry

334 Microwave components manufactu establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 28 Microwave components manufactu employers in New York.

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits (135 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits
Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits (135 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Scientific Components dba Mini-Circuits has more employees than the Microwave components manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · NY · Brooklyn

334 Microwave components manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hayward Quartz Technology, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RESCO Electronics 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brush Industries, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Narda-MITEQ 435 Moreland 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hohl Industrial Services Inc 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling North America 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0224 0224 - XEROX CORPORATION 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buffalo (formerly Trinity Packaging Corporation) 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR TRULIFE 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vulcraft-SC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Carlisle & Finch Co. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR WCR-Capricorn Ridge 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 103572 - Selmon Expressway Western Extension 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE GFL Environmental USA Inc. - Warren, MI 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE TQI 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Homestead, LLC (Brookwood) 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.