Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing · Oregon

Scientific Developments Inc

Eugene, OR · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scientific Developments Inc runs at 636% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Scientific Developments Inc: 21.0 TCR = 636% of Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scientific Developments Inc safety composite

Scientific Developments Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.6

2016→2024

Scientific Developments Inc injury rate improved

Scientific Developments Inc's TCR fell 13.6 from 29.0 in 2016 to 15.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 29.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=29.0 · 2023=18.6 · 2024=15.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Eugene, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.0 · 636% of ind

  • DART 15.4 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Griffith Rubber Mill…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Griffith Rubber Mills - Eugene (1.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Scientific Developments Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scientific Developments Inc averages 21.0 TCR (636% of the Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scientific Developments Inc TCR series: 2016=29 · 2023=18.6 · 2024=15.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Scientific Developments Inc falls in its industry

266 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e. establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e. employers in Oregon.

Scientific Developments Inc (30 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Scientific Developments Inc
Scientific Developments Inc (30 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Scientific Developments Inc has fewer employees than the Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extrude median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.4 15.4 4 0 0
2023 18.6 13.9 4 0 0
2016 29.0 29.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · OR · Eugene

266 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 466 employers in Eugene, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Griffith Rubber Mills - Eugene 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Elastomer Products, Inc 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auburn 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MultiSeal Inc. 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Siri Produce Inc. (Jack) 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sweetheart Orchards, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Botanicals 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coos Bay Area 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR MATT KNIGHT ARENA 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hult Center for the Performing Arts 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG PHOR Clinics 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHMC at University District 564 FTE
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Keasbey,NJ 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SALMXXIII Logistics LLC 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Memphis Burial Vault Company 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Culebra Road 21.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Instantwhip-Akron, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patterson Custom Homes 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earle M Jorgensen Company 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Rapids (1018) 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.