Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · New Hampshire

Scott Electronics, Inc.

Salem, NH · ~142 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scott Electronics, Inc. runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Scott Electronics, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scott Electronics, Inc. safety composite

Scott Electronics, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2017→2023

Scott Electronics, Inc. injury rate improved

Scott Electronics, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Salem, NH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO K98 AER - El Cajon
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: K98 AER - El Cajon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Scott Electronics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scott Electronics, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scott Electronics, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Scott Electronics, Inc. falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in New Hampshire.

Scott Electronics, Inc. (142 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Scott Electronics, Inc.
Scott Electronics, Inc. (142 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Scott Electronics, Inc. has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.1 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · NH · Salem

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 100 employers in Salem, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR K98 AER - El Cajon 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex Tooilng Group 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCB Piezotronics / PCB Piezotronics of 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Positronic Mount Vernon Facility 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 08247 - Store # 8247 Alton 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE 08253 - Store #8253 Meredith 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgewood Center NH 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mt. Carmel Rehabilitation & Nursing Center 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Rehabilitation Hospital Network 700 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT CANOBIE LAKE PARK-FAST FOOD 531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #6 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #06 434 FTE
NAT-TCR Houston #14 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Subsea Technologies Division - Stafford 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Teva Pharmaceuticals USA - Fairfield 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corning - Concord Facility 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nucor Steel Sedalia, LLC 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Super Stop & Shop 0823 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adjustable Bed - Spring Hill 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring City Site 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.