Granulated beet sugar manufacturing · Nebraska

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility

Scottsbluff, NE · ~318 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
4.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility runs at 243% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Granulated beet sugar manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility: 10.2 TCR = 243% of Granulated beet sugar manufacturing BLS 4.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility safety composite

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility injury rate improved

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility's TCR fell 2.9 from 10.7 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.7 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=10.9 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=10.0 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311313 · Scottsbluff, NE ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 243% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK P11
  • PHOTO Billings Montana Fac…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 247 inj
  • SIZE ~318 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Billings Montana Facility (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility averages 10.2 TCR (243% of the Granulated beet sugar manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility TCR series: 2016=10.7 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=10.9 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=10 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 4.2

Where Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility falls in its industry

44 Granulated beet sugar manufact establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility (318 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 221 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility
Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility (318 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 221 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility has more employees than the Granulated beet sugar manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 6.5 24 0 0
2023 9.7 8.2 23 4 0
2022 10.0 8.1 26 5 0
2021 10.7 7.0 26 6 0
2020 7.8 6.1 20 3 0
2019 10.9 6.5 25 7 0
2018 12.9 10.9 44 1 0
2017 11.4 9.1 31 4 0
2016 10.7 8.1 28 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311313 · NE · Scottsbluff

44 Granulated beet sugar manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 51 employers in Scottsbluff, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Billings Montana Facility 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sebewaing Factory 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Morgan Facility 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Breckenridge Piling Ground 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Dynamics, Ordanance and Tactical Systems - Lincoln Operations 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1326 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smeal Fire Apparatus 316 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3395 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regional West Medical Center 1,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regional West Health Services 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR 867 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 867 361 FTE
NAT-TCR LS Contracting Group, Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR A-G Sod Farms, Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fredericksburg Road 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Culligan - Minnetonka 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE MFA Incorporated - Home Office 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division of Environmental Health and Engineering 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delaney Creek 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auxiliary Services Corporation of Suny Cortland 318 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.