Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Minnesota

SCR Central

St. Cloud, MN · ~181 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SCR Central runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

SCR Central: 6.2 TCR = 223% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SCR Central safety composite

SCR Central scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2017→2024

SCR Central injury rate improved

SCR Central's TCR fell 5.7 from 10.6 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.6 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · St. Cloud, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 223% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #86/153
  • PHOTO Sun Light & Power
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 88 inj
  • SIZE ~181 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sun Light & Power (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

SCR Central in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SCR Central averages 6.2 TCR (223% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SCR Central TCR series: 2017=10.6 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 2.8

Where SCR Central falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 153 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Minnesota.

SCR Central (181 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SCR Central
SCR Central (181 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

SCR Central has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 2.9 10 0 0
2023 3.9 2.9 8 0 0
2022 7.8 4.9 16 0 0
2021 5.1 1.7 9 0 0
2020 6.3 2.6 12 0 0
2019 7.3 0.0 13 0 0
2018 4.2 0.6 7 0 0
2017 10.6 6.5 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MN · St. Cloud

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 130 employers in St. Cloud, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sun Light & Power 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FEDER MECHANICAL 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chesapeake Climate Control, LLC. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winona Heating & Ventilating 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - South 601 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Form A Feed 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saputo Dairy Foods USA, LLC 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wells Concrete Products-Albany 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare St. Cloud Hospital 4,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud Hospital 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud State University 1,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Health Plaza 928 FTE
NAT-TCR Mortellaro'S Nursery Ltd Schertz, Tx 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pennington Quality Market 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Wendy's-109 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SYR1 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big Sandy Distribution (11) 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2865 - Spring Grand Parkway North 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2880 - Auburn Center St 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port Saint Lucie Operations LLC 181 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.