Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · Florida

SDB Engineers and Constructors

Titusville, FL · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SDB Engineers and Constructors runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

SDB Engineers and Constructors: 1.2 TCR = 40% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SDB Engineers and Constructors safety composite

SDB Engineers and Constructors scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2018

SDB Engineers and Constructors injury rate improved

SDB Engineers and Constructors's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Titusville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/26
  • PHOTO GreenWood, Inc.- Fuj…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GreenWood, Inc.- Fuji Film (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

SDB Engineers and Constructors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SDB Engineers and Constructors averages 1.2 TCR (40% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SDB Engineers and Constructors TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.9

Where SDB Engineers and Constructors falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 26 Industrial building (except wa employers in Florida.

SDB Engineers and Constructors (44 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SDB Engineers and Constructors
SDB Engineers and Constructors (44 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

SDB Engineers and Constructors has fewer employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · FL · Titusville

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 70 employers in Titusville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GreenWood, Inc.- Fuji Film 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kelly General Construction of Decatur, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwinds Construction 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gary Little Construction, Inc. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HICKORY GROVE 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Aquatic Plant Nursery LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRV Plant Riviera 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hope Power Company 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR 649 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 649 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Titusville (1105) 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeast Power Corporation 366 FTE
NAT-TCR Nri, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR International Paper Bag 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tupelo container 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Plastic Trends 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aqua Illinois, Inc. - Kankakee 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aqua Services, Inc. - Cary 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Bell PA 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE KCP&L - Warrensburg Service Center 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.