Plastics resins, custom compounding of purchased · California

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing

Madera, CA · ~128 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Plastics resins, custom compounding of purchased workplace, earning a grade A.

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Plastics resins, custom compounding of purchased BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing safety composite

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing held a steady TCR band

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Madera, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO Teknor Apex North Ca…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Teknor Apex North Carolina Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Plastics resins, custom compounding of purchased BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing falls in its industry

342 Plastics resins, custom compou establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Plastics resins, custom compou employers in California.

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing (128 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing
Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing (128 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sealed Air Madera Manufacturing has more employees than the Plastics resins, custom compounding of p median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 3 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · CA · Madera

342 Plastics resins, custom compounding of purchased employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 162 employers in Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Teknor Apex North Carolina Company 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avient Corp West Chicago 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEON Performance Solutions 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Polymer Services, LLC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dick Peixoto Company 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE BATTH FARMS 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main operations location 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntyre Labor Services, LLC. 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Farm Management Inc 17,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroff Ag Services Inc 2,253 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 170 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Madera 1,393 FTE
NAT-TCR Field Services Tech Building (Columbia) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KenMor : KenMor - Houston 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Clay 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PJ Green Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ame, Inc. 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #35 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apache - Kiewit Offshore Services 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concrete Technologies, Inc. 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.