Refrigerated warehousing · Alabama

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC

Mobile, AL · ~44 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Refrigerated warehousing workplace, earning a grade B.

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC: 3.1 TCR = 53% of Refrigerated warehousing BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC safety composite

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2020

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC injury rate improved

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.7 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.7 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Mobile, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 53% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #13/19
  • PHOTO Madison Distribution…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Madison Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC averages 3.1 TCR (53% of the Refrigerated warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC TCR series: 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 19 Refrigerated warehousing employers in Alabama.

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC (44 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC
Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC (44 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Seaonus Refrigerated Services - Mobile LLC has fewer employees than the Refrigerated warehousing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.3 1.6 2 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 3.7 1.8 2 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · AL · Mobile

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 505 employers in Mobile, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Madison Distribution Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roanoke 3PL 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agua Mansa-Cross Dock 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amarillo Distribution Center 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SIMCO Construction, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&C Contractors LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asphalt Services, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner at Olin Chlor Alkali Products McIntosh AL 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austal USA LLC 3,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE INFIRMARY 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hargrove Engineers and Constructors 1,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Snider Automotive Group 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 137 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Streator,IL 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 635 - Dallas Branch - Rsg 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carpenter Pole and Piling 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arkema Inc. Blooming Prairie Plant 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hhw36-Bfspr-Homewood Suites Arlington 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Seafood of Arizona 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.