Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · California

Seaport Stainless

Richmond, CA · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seaport Stainless runs at 810% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Seaport Stainless: 26.7 TCR = 810% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seaport Stainless safety composite

Seaport Stainless scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Seaport Stainless: 11.9 → 26.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 48.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Seaport Stainless's TCR rose 14.4 from 11.9 in 2017 to 26.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 48.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.7 · 810% of ind

  • DART 15.8 DART
  • RANK #98/98
  • PHOTO McAlpin Industries W…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McAlpin Industries Walworth (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Seaport Stainless in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seaport Stainless averages 26.7 TCR (810% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seaport Stainless TCR series: 2017=11.9 · 2018=12.4 · 2019=15.7 · 2020=43.2 · 2021=36 · 2022=48.5 · 2023=19.8 · 2024=26.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Seaport Stainless falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 98 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in California.

Seaport Stainless (30 employees, TCR 26.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Seaport Stainless
Seaport Stainless (30 employees, TCR 26.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Seaport Stainless has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 26.4 15.8 5 0 0
2023 19.8 14.9 4 0 0
2022 48.5 43.6 4 6 0
2021 36.0 27.0 6 2 0
2020 43.2 38.4 9 0 0
2019 15.7 11.8 4 0 0
2018 12.4 12.4 4 0 0
2017 11.9 9.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CA · Richmond

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McAlpin Industries Walworth 26.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Distribution Inc. - Phoenix, AZ 27.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aladdin 25.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Industrial 23.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BZNUR 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1780 San Juan Rd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Oaks 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfields Turf, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Valley Milling and Lumber 26.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZGRN 26.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Max & Erma's Peters Township 26.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-ORF-NORFOLK-PD 26.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concare Inc 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peak Truss Builders LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Tank and Engineering Company, Inc. (CR) 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Retreat at Sunriver 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.