Residential property managing · Washington
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority
Seattle, WA · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 0.0
- Avg TCR
- 1.4
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Residential property managing workplace, earning a grade C.
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Residential property managing BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority safety composite
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
81/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- A 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 100% of industry peers
- DART rate
- B 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 80% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority held a steady TCR band
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.0 TCR.
2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 531311 · Seattle, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL
Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #0/12
- PHOTO Leland Management, I…
- BOOK 2y book
- INJ 0 inj
- SIZE ~47 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Leland Management, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- Leland Managem 0.1
Leland Management, Inc.
0.1 TCR
- TF Cornerstone 0.1
TF Cornerstone Inc.
0.1 TCR
- Corporate Chic 0.1
Corporate Chicago
0.1 TCR
- GREP Atlanta ( 0.1
GREP Atlanta (City Office)
0.1 TCR
- This site 0
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority
0 TCR
What this shows Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Residential property managing BLS benchmark).
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4
Where Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority falls in its industry
500 Residential property managing establishmentsSafer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.
Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 12 Residential property managing employers in Washington.
Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority has fewer employees than the Residential property managing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
531311 · WA · Seattle
500 Residential property managing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Leland Management, Inc. | 0.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | TF Cornerstone Inc. | 0.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Corporate Chicago | 0.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | GREP Atlanta (City Office) | 0.1 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Longview ST. Helens | 47 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Stemilt Ag Services (Administration) | 47 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | RAH Washington Division Office/Home Gallery | 47 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | IMAC Inc | 47 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | UW Seattle | 32,378 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | The United States of America | 25,000 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Starz Entertainment | 25,000 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW | 11,307 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Other Location | 0.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Putzel Electrical Contractors, Inc. | 0.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | TXC101551 | 0.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Gaapr - Ups Supply Chain Solutions | 0.0 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Cardinal Court | 47 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Quail Ridge | 47 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Tazewell Machine Works, Inc | 47 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Lighting Services Inc. | 47 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.