Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) · Washington

Seattle Distribution Center

Seattle, WA · ~23 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seattle Distribution Center runs at 577% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Seattle Distribution Center: 4.0 TCR = 577% of Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS 0.7 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seattle Distribution Center safety composite

Seattle Distribution Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

Seattle Distribution Center injury rate improved

Seattle Distribution Center's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2019=7.5 · 2021=3.9 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.0 · 577% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO Wave Division Holdin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Concord (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Seattle Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seattle Distribution Center averages 4.0 TCR (577% of the Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seattle Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2019=7.5 · 2021=3.9 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Seattle Distribution Center falls in its industry

537 Internet service providers, us establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Internet service providers, us employers in Washington.

Seattle Distribution Center (23 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Seattle Distribution Center
Seattle Distribution Center (23 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Seattle Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Internet service providers, using own op median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2019 7.5 3.8 2 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · WA · Seattle

537 Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Concord 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR West River Telecommunications Cooperative 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HSTXTXMK 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Contoocook 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NORTHWEST PRODUCTION & FARMING 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kahala Farms LLC. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayonier PNW Hoquiam 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayonier PNW Poulsbo 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Raley's 316-Pleasanton 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brandon Wilde 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shima'S Market 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Salisbury, Nc 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3006 Hai143 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 643 Swn59 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 639 Swn62 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 633 Swn68 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.