Food banks · California

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc.

Irvine, CA · ~82 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food banks workplace, earning a grade D.

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 138% of Food banks BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. safety composite

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2017→2022

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. injury rate improved

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc.'s TCR fell 5.5 from 6.8 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.8 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624210 · Irvine, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/19
  • PHOTO Central Pennsylvania…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Pennsylvania Food Bank (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (138% of the Food banks BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.8 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=1.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. falls in its industry

147 Food banks establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 19 Food banks employers in California.

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. (82 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc.
Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. (82 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County Inc. has more employees than the Food banks median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 5.2 2.6 3 1 0
2020 2.1 1.1 1 1 0
2019 6.7 6.7 6 0 0
2018 9.3 6.7 7 0 0
2017 6.8 6.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624210 · CA · Irvine

147 Food banks employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 622 employers in Irvine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Pennsylvania Food Bank 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Bank of the Rockies - Western Slope 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 12434 THE FOOD BASKET INC. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SeniorServ 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Coast Harvesting Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wight Vineyard Management, Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Harvesting LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine 16,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-10 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Lifesciences 4,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson MDD CSS Irvine 3,775 FTE
NAT-TCR Davannis Inc. Eagan 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-EA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR (04) MD Location 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0005-0005-01721 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Lake Orienta 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blaine Brothers, Inc. - N.A. Trailer Sales - IGH 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leclerc Foods Nutrition 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mystic Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.