Community meals, social services · California

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing

San Carlos, CA · ~25 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Community meals, social services workplace, earning a grade F.

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing: 12.3 TCR = 324% of Community meals, social services BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing safety composite

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−36.9

2022→2024

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing injury rate improved

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing's TCR fell 36.9 from 36.9 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 36.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=36.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624210 · San Carlos, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 324% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/19
  • PHOTO MOWWM
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MOWWM (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing averages 12.3 TCR (324% of the Community meals, social services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing TCR series: 2022=36.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing falls in its industry

147 Community meals, social servic establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 19 Community meals, social servic employers in California.

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing (25 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing (25 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Bing has fewer employees than the Community meals, social services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 36.9 21.1 2 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624210 · CA · San Carlos

147 Community meals, social services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 57 employers in San Carlos, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MOWWM 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Good Shepherd Food Bank - Auburn 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westmoreland County Food Bank, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Gatherers 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rudolph and Sletten 686 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30507) 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10145) 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Mateo County Transit District 293 FTE
NAT-TCR Honey Holding I Ltd dba Honey Solutions 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PAL Spokane LLC 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BKLBROOKLYNNY 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AAA Club Alliance Springfield VA 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Dock Products - Houston 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Machinery Systems, LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE McGriff Birmingham Commercial 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cherry Springs Village 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.