Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Washington

Selma Carson Home

Fife, WA · ~24 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Selma Carson Home runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade F.

Selma Carson Home: 7.6 TCR = 201% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Selma Carson Home safety composite

Selma Carson Home scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2018→2024

Selma Carson Home injury rate improved

Selma Carson Home's TCR fell 8.6 from 8.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.6 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=9.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Fife, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 201% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Every Child's Hope
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Every Child's Hope (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Selma Carson Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Selma Carson Home averages 7.6 TCR (201% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Selma Carson Home TCR series: 2018=8.6 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=9.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Selma Carson Home falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Washington.

Selma Carson Home (24 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Selma Carson Home
Selma Carson Home (24 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Selma Carson Home has fewer employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 9.4 9.4 1 1 0
2019 12.6 0.0 3 0 0
2018 8.6 4.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · WA · Fife

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 90 employers in Fife, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Every Child's Hope 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 540019 114111_TEXHOMA_ABI 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 510725 CA 1136 PUENTE AVE 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shelter/Wolverine Center 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Krainick Dairy LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE View Point Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Shellfish Grays Harbor LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olympia Yard 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Puyallup Tribe of Indians Emerald Queen Hotel & Casinos 2,236 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RNT9 816 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1323 34th Ave E 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milgard Windows & Doors -- Tacoma Manufacturing 381 FTE
NAT-TCR The Bay at Eastview Medical & Rehab. 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Technical Steel Construction 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Philadelphia Cooked 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hancock Lumber Company- Casco Sawmill 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Value Added Distributors - Fort Payne 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Oswego Public Works Department 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanical Construction & Consulting, Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feasterville 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.