Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Florida

Seminole Generating Station

Palatka, FL · ~223 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seminole Generating Station runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Seminole Generating Station: 3.0 TCR = 251% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seminole Generating Station safety composite

Seminole Generating Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Seminole Generating Station injury rate improved

Seminole Generating Station's TCR fell 1.3 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=4.0 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Palatka, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 251% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/43
  • PHOTO Electric Production
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electric Production (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Seminole Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seminole Generating Station averages 3.0 TCR (251% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seminole Generating Station TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=4 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=3 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Seminole Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 43 Electric power generation, fos employers in Florida.

Seminole Generating Station (223 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Seminole Generating Station
Seminole Generating Station (223 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Seminole Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 3.0 0.6 1 4 0
2022 3.9 1.1 4 3 0
2021 4.2 0.8 4 6 0
2020 4.4 0.0 2 9 0
2019 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2017 4.0 0.7 9 2 0
2016 2.6 1.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · FL · Palatka

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 59 employers in Palatka, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electric Production 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Power, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Illinois Power Cooperative 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSE, TAC - Tacoma Business Office 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Full-Tilt Contracting, LLC 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fun Sweets LLC 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE AB Property Services, Inc. DBA Happy Floors 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Monte Fresh Produce Company (Corp) 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR FL180 Palatka Paper 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR PALATKA CENTER FOR REHAB & HEALING 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR HH-PALATHME 560 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Putnam Hospital 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Chris Candies, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Artlow Systems, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dawn Food Products - Jackson Manufacturing 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mafco Worldwide LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Fine Sinter Co., Ltd 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florence 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Las Vegas, LLC 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hexcel Seguin 223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.