Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · New York

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Waterloo, NY · ~106 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 4.7 TCR = 72% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2023

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 2.1 from 6.4 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Waterloo, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.7 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #238/616
  • PHOTO Concord Care Center
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Concord Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 4.7 TCR (72% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2021=4 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=4.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #238 safest of 616 Convalescent homes or convales employers in New York.

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (106 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (106 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Seneca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.3 1.4 3 0 0
2022 4.2 2.1 2 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2016 6.4 6.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Waterloo

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 23 employers in Waterloo, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Concord Care Center 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Irving Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stonespring of Vandalia 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medicalodges Wichita 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wayne County Eggs LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consigli Construction NY, LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Bridge Company - 482310 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE J Track 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR del Lago Resort & Casino 733 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1705 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1705 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR HEP Materials Corp. 166 FTE
NAT-TCR 1905 Culberson IH 10 Safety Rest Areas 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard by Marriott Hotel 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Byron Park 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Counter 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tri County Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chaska Town Course 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utah 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.