Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · California

Sensata Technologies Inc

Thousand Oaks, CA · ~300 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sensata Technologies Inc runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Sensata Technologies Inc: 3.3 TCR = 101% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sensata Technologies Inc safety composite

Sensata Technologies Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2022→2024

Sensata Technologies Inc injury rate improved

Sensata Technologies Inc's TCR fell 6.5 from 7.7 in 2022 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Thousand Oaks, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #70/104
  • PHOTO TTS Forest
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~300 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TTS Forest (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sensata Technologies Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sensata Technologies Inc averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sensata Technologies Inc TCR series: 2022=7.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Sensata Technologies Inc falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 104 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in California.

Sensata Technologies Inc (300 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sensata Technologies Inc
Sensata Technologies Inc (300 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Sensata Technologies Inc has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.3 4 0 0
2023 0.9 0.0 3 0 0
2022 7.7 6.8 4 21 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CA · Thousand Oaks

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Thousand Oaks, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TTS Forest 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aero Arc Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaiser Aircraft Ind. Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bell - RTI 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fairbanks Ranch 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCF4 Solutions 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 14401 SATICOY 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE OAKLAND SERVICE CENTER 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amgen Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA) 5,792 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amgen USA (Sales - Flex workers) 2,803 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 472 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR The Pearl of Orchard Valley 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR D1730 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MUSC Columbia Downtown 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4143 Warrington 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE NatureBest Pre-Cut & Produce NB1 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covenant Living at Windsor Park 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoprite of Englewood 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hopkins Center 300 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.