Fruit and vegetables, dehydrating, manufacturing · California

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston

Livingston, CA · ~235 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fruit and vegetables, dehydrating, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston: 5.6 TCR = 169% of Fruit and vegetables, dehydrating, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston safety composite

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2021

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston injury rate improved

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston's TCR fell 0.6 from 5.2 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 51.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=7.1 · 2020=51.0 · 2021=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311423 · Livingston, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 169% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #16/25
  • PHOTO Columbia Phytotechno…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~235 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbia Phytotechnology (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston averages 5.6 TCR (169% of the Fruit and vegetables, dehydrating, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=7.1 · 2020=51 · 2021=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston falls in its industry

123 Fruit and vegetables, dehydrat establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 25 Fruit and vegetables, dehydrat employers in California.

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston (235 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston
Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston (235 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Sensient Natural Ingredients, Livingston has more employees than the Fruit and vegetables, dehydrating, manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.5 4.1 11 0 0
2020 51.0 51.0 13 0 0
2018 7.1 5.8 14 3 0
2017 5.2 4.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311423 · CA · Livingston

123 Fruit and vegetables, dehydrating, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 32 employers in Livingston, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbia Phytotechnology 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olam West Coast Inc.dba Olam Spices - Firebaugh 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden State Herbs 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Basic American Ingredients 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AGR CONTRACTING 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE Framing by Superior, Inc. 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Bay Area Interior (555) 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Plan 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livingston 1,823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livingston Deli 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR E&J Gallo Livingston 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR E&J Gallo Winery 319 FTE
NAT-TCR MSP Terminal 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CHRISTUS Spohn Kleberg 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenview Manor 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Townsend Leather Company 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sartori Whey 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berwald Roofing Company., Inc. 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE PMG-Kaseman 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZHAM 235 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.