Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers · New Jersey

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA

Englewood, NJ · ~119 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA: 1.9 TCR = 85% of Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA safety composite

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA: 1.4 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.19× in 2024

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA's TCR rose 2.7 from 1.4 in 2021 to 4.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424410 · Englewood, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 85% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #6/55
  • PHOTO Accardi Foods Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Accardi Foods Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA averages 1.9 TCR (85% of the Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA TCR series: 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA falls in its industry

1,651 Groceries, general-line, merch establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 55 Groceries, general-line, merch employers in New Jersey.

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA (119 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA
Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA (119 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Seoul Shik Poom Inc. DBA Seoul Trading USA has fewer employees than the Groceries, general-line, merchant wholes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 4.1 3 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 1.4 0.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424410 · NJ · Englewood

1,651 Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 34 employers in Englewood, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Accardi Foods Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transportation : North Hatfield - Trans 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPI Specialty Foods - Rocky Mountain 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prince Distributors 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water - Delran 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hollister Construction Services 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darling Ingredients 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE LPS Industries LLC 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Englewood Hospital and Medical Center 3,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR Calvin Maintenance Inc. 613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lorenzo Food Group 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shoprite of Englewood 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake City 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hollingsworth Schertz 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY - Woodlake - Ops Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Magnolia Mall 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE North America : Stockton 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bauer Underground, Inc. 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blackfoot 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated Nashville 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.