Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Colorado

Septodont Louisville

Louisville, CO · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Septodont Louisville runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Septodont Louisville: 6.1 TCR = 186% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Septodont Louisville safety composite

Septodont Louisville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2020

Septodont Louisville injury rate improved

Septodont Louisville's TCR fell 6.6 from 8.9 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.9 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Louisville, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #19/21
  • PHOTO Nutrition Laboratori…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nutrition Laboratories Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Septodont Louisville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Septodont Louisville averages 6.1 TCR (186% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Septodont Louisville TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2018=4 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Septodont Louisville falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 21 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Colorado.

Septodont Louisville (74 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Septodont Louisville
Septodont Louisville (74 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Septodont Louisville has fewer employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2019 9.3 5.3 7 0 0
2018 4.0 1.0 3 1 0
2016 8.9 6.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · CO · Louisville

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 79 employers in Louisville, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nutrition Laboratories Inc 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 301 Island Rd 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Captek Cerritos 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR INW Proform Labs 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Natural Soda LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherokee Station-105 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pawnee Station-888 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corden Pharma Boulder 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avista Adventist Hospital 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Avista 629 FTE
CITY-NEAR Louisville - LOU 608 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2000 Taylor 578 FTE
NAT-TCR O'Malley Wood Products 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Deland 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New Standard Corporation - Emigsville Facility 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gillette (GCR) 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Houston Main Office 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE FreshPoint Raleigh167 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farm Hands Leasing 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raleigh/Durham NC FXFE-RDU 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.