Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community

Fortuna, CA · ~49 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community runs at 491% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community: 18.6 TCR = 491% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community safety composite

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community: 16.9 → 35.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 35.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community's TCR rose 18.5 from 16.9 in 2021 to 35.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fortuna, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.6 · 491% of ind

  • DART 15.9 DART
  • RANK #560/635
  • PHOTO Overland Court Senio…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Overland Court Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community averages 18.6 TCR (491% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community TCR series: 2021=16.9 · 2022=12.1 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=35.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #560 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community (49 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community
Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community (49 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 35.4 15.9 20 0 0
2023 10.2 6.1 5 0 0
2022 12.1 7.3 5 0 0
2021 16.9 2.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Fortuna

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 27 employers in Fortuna, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Overland Court Senior Living 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecumen Brooks 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CY-HHH2-SPRING ARBOR CARY 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RD-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR RICHMOND 18.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAJES FARMS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunview Shandon 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rawah-Napa County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Farms 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 498 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORTHERN REGION : HUU 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001440 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA835 REDWOOD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL HR 181 FTE
NAT-TCR Trenton 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1394 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pallet Express 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plas-Tech Coatings 18.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rainbow Research Optics, LLC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alttran, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE 104768 - GPA - CB1 Realignment 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamieson Produce Inc 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.