Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc.

Denver, CO · ~60 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc.: 8.0 TCR = 212% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. safety composite

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2018→2020

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. injury rate improved

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 8.4 in 2018 to 7.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.4 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 212% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #59/140
  • PHOTO Town Village Assiste…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town Village Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. averages 8.0 TCR (212% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. TCR series: 2018=8.4 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=7.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc.
Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Serenity House Assisted Living, Inc. has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 7.9 5.6 7 0 0
2019 7.8 4.5 7 0 0
2018 8.4 6.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Denver

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Town Village Assisted Living 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Athens Health Partners DBA The Lindley Inn 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Stuart 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VIVERA OF JEFFERSONVILLE 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Empire Electric Association 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE O&M Boulder 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1777 Chestnut Place 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Regency Redmond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cookson Enterprise 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bloomday Granite & Marble 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Boise Co-op 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hs Fs 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE COVENTYA, INC. - Ohio 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE TUP 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.