Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Michigan

Serenus Johnson Constr

Bay City, MI · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Serenus Johnson Constr runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Serenus Johnson Constr: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Serenus Johnson Constr safety composite

Serenus Johnson Constr scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Serenus Johnson Constr held a steady TCR band

Serenus Johnson Constr's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Bay City, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/121
  • PHOTO Tripp Enterprises Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tripp Enterprises Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Serenus Johnson Constr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Serenus Johnson Constr averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Serenus Johnson Constr TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Serenus Johnson Constr falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 121 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Michigan.

Serenus Johnson Constr (47 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Serenus Johnson Constr
Serenus Johnson Constr (47 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Serenus Johnson Constr has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MI · Bay City

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 138 employers in Bay City, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tripp Enterprises Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Construction 2016 OSHA 300 & 300A 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tepcon Construction Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Houston 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Oakland Enterprises LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE OPEN ROAD LOGISTICS LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNT ELLIOTT_1373985 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE ESCANABA_1362718 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Bay Region 1,858 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Medical Center INC 1,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay City Factory 522 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay City Components 421 FTE
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aloft Tallahassee FL 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carlson Racine Roofing & Sheet Metal Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harold White Millworks Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rebar International, Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.