Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water · Washington

ServiceMaster of Seattle

Woodinville, WA · ~88 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ServiceMaster of Seattle runs at 518% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water workplace, earning a grade F.

ServiceMaster of Seattle: 13.5 TCR = 518% of Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ServiceMaster of Seattle safety composite

ServiceMaster of Seattle scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2023→2024

ServiceMaster of Seattle injury rate improved

ServiceMaster of Seattle's TCR fell 2.2 from 14.6 in 2023 to 12.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=14.6 · 2024=12.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562910 · Woodinville, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.5 · 518% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #18/20
  • PHOTO Daniels Sharpsmart I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Daniels Sharpsmart Inc - Shakopee (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

ServiceMaster of Seattle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ServiceMaster of Seattle averages 13.5 TCR (518% of the Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ServiceMaster of Seattle TCR series: 2023=14.6 · 2024=12.4 · BLS 2.6

Where ServiceMaster of Seattle falls in its industry

672 Remediation and clean up of co establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 20 Remediation and clean up of co employers in Washington.

ServiceMaster of Seattle (88 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ServiceMaster of Seattle
ServiceMaster of Seattle (88 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

ServiceMaster of Seattle has more employees than the Remediation and clean up of contaminated median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.4 10.1 9 2 0
2023 14.6 14.6 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562910 · WA · Woodinville

672 Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 108 employers in Woodinville, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Daniels Sharpsmart Inc - Shakopee 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baxter Group Inc 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leavens Enterprises Inc. 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paul Davis Emergency Services 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MainVue Homes, LLC. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE NW Division 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE M&C Construction, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meridian Center Electric, Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chateau Ste. Michelle 741 FTE
CITY-NEAR Precor Manufacturing, LLC 545 FTE
CITY-NEAR Precor Incorporated 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia Crest Winery 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Indiana Wheel Company, LLC 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Customer First Logistics LLC 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Business Development LLC 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LQ Logistics LLC 13.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lad Stadium Club Din 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE HR Bloomington MN 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE GRAD Ann Arbor 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wildeck, Inc. - North 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.