Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors · Virginia

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley

Fishersville, VA · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley: 9.5 TCR = 251% of Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley safety composite

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2016→2019

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley injury rate improved

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley's TCR fell 10.2 from 13.8 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.8 · 2017=12.4 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Fishersville, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 251% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/21
  • PHOTO Dianda Construction
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dianda Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley averages 9.5 TCR (251% of the Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley TCR series: 2016=13.8 · 2017=12.4 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley falls in its industry

698 Fire and flood restoration, si establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 21 Fire and flood restoration, si employers in Virginia.

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley (34 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley
ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley (34 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

ServiceMaster of Shenandoah Valley has fewer employees than the Fire and flood restoration, single-famil median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 8.3 8.3 3 0 0
2017 12.4 9.3 4 0 0
2016 13.8 11.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · VA · Fishersville

698 Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 34 employers in Fishersville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dianda Construction 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highmark Companies 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR William C Rott & Son Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crush City Construction 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge Aquaculture 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Williams Logging Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEAR GARDEN 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE INGENCO/CCI Dabney 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Augusta Health 2,456 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CHO1 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR VASTA - STAUNTON 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilson Worforce and Rehabilitatiion Center 314 FTE
NAT-TCR First Cooperative Association Aurelia 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilmington DE 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The City of Statesville 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR NorthStar Battery Plant 1 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Tyler South 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Organic Dyes and Pigments LLC- Ep 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE District Wide 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Urologic Surgery of ME 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.