Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing · Michigan

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North

Dearborn, MI · ~127 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North: 5.3 TCR = 159% of Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North safety composite

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North: 3.9 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North's TCR rose 2.7 from 3.9 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Dearborn, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO WeightPack
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WeightPack (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North averages 5.3 TCR (159% of the Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North falls in its industry

269 Testing, weighing, inspecting, establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Testing, weighing, inspecting, employers in Michigan.

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North (127 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North
Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North (127 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn North has more employees than the Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 0.0 8 0 0
2016 3.9 1.9 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · MI · Dearborn

269 Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 130 employers in Dearborn, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WeightPack 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BWIS - Loveland 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auger Fabrication 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PKG - Colorado 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Constantine CON1 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Meyer - Escanaba 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marathon Petroleum Detroit MI- BSL 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Valley Foods Wayland 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER TRUCK 20,749 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dearborn Truck Plant 5,037 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-1 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER DESIGN 3,940 FTE
NAT-TCR Shelbyville Manor 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marvin Wood Products - Baker City 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Northside Yard 120 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Shivvers Manufacturing Inc 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dixie Roofing, Inc. - LaFollette 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crowder Construction Company - Heavy Civil Division 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0082 Reno 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Envelope Mart Inc 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.