Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Oregon

SH - Building B

Salem, OR · ~1,160 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SH - Building B runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

SH - Building B: 4.6 TCR = 61% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SH - Building B safety composite

SH - Building B scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2024

SH - Building B injury rate improved

SH - Building B's TCR fell 6.0 from 8.2 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Salem, OR AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 4.6 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #44/128
  • PHOTO SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 479 inj
  • SIZE ~1,160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

SH - Building B in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SH - Building B averages 4.6 TCR (61% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SH - Building B TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=3 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 7.5

Where SH - Building B falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 128 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Oregon.

SH - Building B (1,160 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SH - Building B
SH - Building B (1,160 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

SH - Building B has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 1.5 21 1 0
2023 2.9 2.1 32 0 0
2022 3.2 1.9 25 9 0
2021 4.4 1.6 67 5 0
2020 7.3 3.0 66 38 0
2019 5.7 1.5 80 7 0
2018 3.0 0.9 44 1 0
2017 4.4 2.5 56 5 0
2016 8.2 4.3 88 10 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · OR · Salem

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Winter Garden 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Lenexa 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR McLaren Thumb Region 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tailwind (IHM - Beaverton) 1,170 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCH 1,146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siri and Son Farms 1,176 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR343 PROVIDENCE MEDFORD MEDICAL CENTER HR 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR KYTC District 3 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Showcase 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookfield Renewable - Potsdam 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Angels Baseball LP 1,160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orlando FL 1,160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portsmouth Regional Hospital 1,160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Children's Community Care 1,161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.