Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Florida

Shalimar

Shalimar, FL · ~237 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shalimar runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade A.

Shalimar: 0.2 TCR = 40% of Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shalimar safety composite

Shalimar scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2017

Shalimar injury rate improved

Shalimar's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.4 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Shalimar, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO Auburn Hills North -…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~237 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Auburn Hills North - Research, Test and Development (We do not manufacture) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Shalimar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shalimar averages 0.2 TCR (40% of the Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shalimar TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2017=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Shalimar falls in its industry

319 Physical science research and establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Physical science research and employers in Florida.

Shalimar (237 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Shalimar
Shalimar (237 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Shalimar has more employees than the Physical science research and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.4 0.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · FL · Shalimar

319 Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 5 employers in Shalimar, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Auburn Hills North - Research, Test and Development (We do not manufacture) 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NuScale Power, LLC. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greatbatch 10K 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huntsman Advanced Technology Center 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Martin Plant 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake City 261 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 1410 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 0436 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR COLSA Corporation - Florida 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR FS1 1150 Eglin Parkway 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity ADC - Headquarters 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity ADC - Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) Eglin, Air Force Base (AFB) 24 FTE
NAT-TCR Athlon Solutions- Corporate 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockwell Automation- Milwaukee WI (MKE) 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR KeeneSales 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2073-ASA-20730220-FO 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Marcos Operations 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Office 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Vega Alta Controls, PR 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pontiac (Mipon) 237 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.