Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Michigan

Shape Corp - Comstock

Grand Haven, MI · ~112 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shape Corp - Comstock runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Shape Corp - Comstock: 4.2 TCR = 77% of Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shape Corp - Comstock safety composite

Shape Corp - Comstock scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shape Corp - Comstock: 3.1 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2024

Shape Corp - Comstock's TCR rose 3.6 from 3.1 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Grand Haven, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.2 · 77% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #103/146
  • PHOTO Neaton Rome Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Neaton Rome Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Shape Corp - Comstock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shape Corp - Comstock averages 4.2 TCR (77% of the Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shape Corp - Comstock TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 5.4

Where Shape Corp - Comstock falls in its industry

772 Bumpers and bumperettes assemb establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 146 Bumpers and bumperettes assemb employers in Michigan.

Shape Corp - Comstock (112 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Shape Corp - Comstock
Shape Corp - Comstock (112 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Shape Corp - Comstock has fewer employees than the Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, autom median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 5.0 4 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 3.2 3.2 2 1 0
2021 5.1 5.1 5 0 0
2020 5.4 5.4 5 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 5 0 0
2018 6.2 5.5 9 0 0
2017 2.9 2.2 4 0 0
2016 3.1 2.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · MI · Grand Haven

772 Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 81 employers in Grand Haven, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Neaton Rome Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ocean Ranch 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inalfa Roof Systems 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RIKER PRODUCTS INC 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andy Mast Greenhouses 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1557_3150 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thumb Plastics, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rugged Liner, Plant 1 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Haven Area Public Schools 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shape Corp - 14600 172nd Ave. 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Ottawa Community Hospital 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR TH Grand Haven Hospital-MH-MI 409 FTE
NAT-TCR Chambersburg 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Terex - Watertown 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ong Wr Shawnee Sc 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Merrick Engineering, Inc 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Longhorn Dallas 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanders Wood Products-Precision Mill 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astra Group, LLC 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duraloy Technologies Inc. 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.