Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing · Wisconsin

Shape Products

Menomonie, WI · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shape Products runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Shape Products: 4.7 TCR = 144% of Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shape Products safety composite

Shape Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−369.2

2017→2024

Shape Products injury rate improved

Shape Products's TCR fell 369.2 from 369.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 369.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=369.2 · 2022=8.0 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Menomonie, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 144% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #121/166
  • PHOTO Baraboo Blow and Inj…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baraboo Blow and Injection Molding (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Shape Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shape Products averages 4.7 TCR (144% of the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shape Products TCR series: 2017=369.2 · 2022=8 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Shape Products falls in its industry

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., bask establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #121 safest of 166 Utility containers (e.g., bask employers in Wisconsin.

Shape Products (43 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shape Products
Shape Products (43 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Shape Products has fewer employees than the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.3 6.3 3 0 0
2022 8.0 2.0 4 0 0
2017 369.2 92.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · WI · Menomonie

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 78 employers in Menomonie, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baraboo Blow and Injection Molding 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Syntec Optics 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Traverse Plastics Corp 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8373_19062 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holsum Irish Dairy 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babcock Receiving 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverside Generating Station 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6025 912 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6025 869 FTE
CITY-NEAR Menomonie 690 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips-Medisize, LLC - Phillips Medical 653 FTE
NAT-TCR Valicoff Fruit Company, Inc 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center-Klein 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BrandFX, LLC - Swea City 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Butts Foods - Birmingham 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hedke Painting 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoogendoorn Construction, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kinnucan Company 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanicsburg 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.