Soft drinks manufacturing · Ohio

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus

Obetz, OH · ~107 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Soft drinks manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Soft drinks manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus safety composite

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus injury rate improved

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Obetz, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO 15022 Dallas, TX (Bu…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 15022 Dallas, TX (Buckner) - Production (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Soft drinks manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus falls in its industry

516 Soft drinks manufacturing establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Soft drinks manufacturing employers in Ohio.

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus (107 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus
Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus (107 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Shasta Beverages, Inc Columbus has fewer employees than the Soft drinks manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.0 2.6 8 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.1 1.4 3 0 0
2019 2.5 0.8 2 1 0
2018 2.6 1.8 3 0 0
2017 7.9 7.9 7 0 0
2016 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · OH · Obetz

516 Soft drinks manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 22 employers in Obetz, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 15022 Dallas, TX (Buckner) - Production 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Refresco - Greer Plant 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LiDestri Pennsauken 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PNB MT Angel OR 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 292-NiSource-Columbus OH-East Op Ctr 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEILERCO 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Aluminum Corporation 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reliable Contractors Inc 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus 1,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Sort Center 1,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH2 1,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CMH2 920 FTE
NAT-TCR Kau Hospital 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Jamestown Coatings 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health Knoxville DC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lorig Construction Company 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tampa TAM 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shield Air Solutions 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinton 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE GL Workforce Center 3501 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.