Carbonated soft drinks manufacturing · Georgia

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville

Gainesville, GA · ~132 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Carbonated soft drinks manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Carbonated soft drinks manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville safety composite

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville held a steady TCR band

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Gainesville, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO TruRoots
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TruRoots (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Carbonated soft drinks manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=5 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville falls in its industry

516 Carbonated soft drinks manufac establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Carbonated soft drinks manufac employers in Georgia.

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville (132 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville
Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville (132 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Shasta Beverages Inc Gainesville has fewer employees than the Carbonated soft drinks manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.8 4 0 0
2023 6.9 5.0 11 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 6 0 0
2021 5.0 3.1 8 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2019 4.3 2.8 6 0 0
2018 5.2 3.2 8 0 0
2017 2.9 2.4 4 1 0
2016 2.2 1.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · GA · Gainesville

516 Carbonated soft drinks manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 306 employers in Gainesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TruRoots 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co of Central Va Warrenton 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FAYGO BEVERAGES INC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lenexa Production 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas G 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgia Feed 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lonesome Oak Trading Co. - Bldg 365 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mondi Bags USA, LLC 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation 1,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poultry Processing 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant 1,190 FTE
NAT-TCR Store #68 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hempfield Manor 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Elliott Equipment Company 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Springs at Sunnyview 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE BRANCO Enterprises, Inc. 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Borger 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westchester Modular Homes, Inc. 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE SFC Gillett 333 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.