Soft drinks manufacturing · Kansas

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa

Lenexa, KS · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Soft drinks manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa: 2.3 TCR = 68% of Soft drinks manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa safety composite

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2024

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Lenexa, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #1/12
  • PHOTO ATLANTA GA (GATORADE)
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATLANTA GA (GATORADE) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa averages 2.3 TCR (68% of the Soft drinks manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=2 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa falls in its industry

516 Soft drinks manufacturing establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 12 Soft drinks manufacturing employers in Kansas.

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa (52 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa
Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa (52 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Shasta Beverages, inc Lenexa has fewer employees than the Soft drinks manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2019 3.9 2.0 2 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · KS · Lenexa

516 Soft drinks manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 319 employers in Lenexa, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATLANTA GA (GATORADE) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 16321 Abilene, TX (Production) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interactions Inc. dba Hoosier Refreshment Co. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gulf States Canners, Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wichita Kansas 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Feedyard LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Leawood 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unique Metal Fabrication, LLC 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR RailCrew Xpress 3,169 FTE
CITY-NEAR LENEXA (KSLEN) 2,266 FTE
CITY-NEAR KSLEN - LENEXA 2,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kiewit Corporation_9401 Renner Boulevard 1,653 FTE
NAT-TCR Teknor Apex Company - Rhode Island 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Highlands- Dry Bulk Transport 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR International Paper Kennett Square Warehouse 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nippon Paint Automotive Americas, Inc. - Lansing 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norfolk Nfk 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern California 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE MEJA Construction, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Republic Services of PA LLC 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.