Forklift repair and maintenance services · Tennessee

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis

Memphis, TN · ~95 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Forklift repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade B.

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis: 1.5 TCR = 73% of Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis safety composite

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2020→2022

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis injury rate improved

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.7 in 2020 to 0.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.7 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Memphis, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/67
  • PHOTO Aero Alliance Produc…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aero Alliance Product & Services JV LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis averages 1.5 TCR (73% of the Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis TCR series: 2020=2.7 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.9 · BLS 2.1

Where Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis falls in its industry

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenanc establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 67 Forklift repair and maintenanc employers in Tennessee.

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis (95 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis
Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis (95 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Shaw Material Handling Systems, Inc./Memphis has more employees than the Forklift repair and maintenance services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 2.7 0.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TN · Memphis

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,330 employers in Memphis, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aero Alliance Product & Services JV LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Empire Technology - SITECH 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lavender, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLT2 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GP Vaccination (Loretto) 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Memphis, TN HVAC 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 2903 SPRANKLE DR 12,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 381940311 9,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Residential Services 5,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 5,599 FTE
NAT-TCR Parsec COI 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR North American Pipe Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mcguire and Hester 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WBI Energy Corrosion Services Billings Operations 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trilogy Home Healthcare - Orlando 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Archroma U.S. Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6957-JAC 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nelson-Miller, Berlin WI 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.