Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) · Texas

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office

Midland, TX · ~343 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) workplace, earning a grade A.

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office: 0.0 TCR = 2% of Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) BLS 1.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office safety composite

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office held a steady TCR band

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 211111 · Midland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.0 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/78
  • PHOTO EQT Corporation - Pi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~343 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EQT Corporation - Pittsburgh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shell Permian - Midland Field Office averages 0.0 TCR (2% of the Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 1.9

Where Shell Permian - Midland Field Office falls in its industry

225 Petroleum, crude, production ( establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 78 Petroleum, crude, production ( employers in Texas.

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office (343 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Shell Permian - Midland Field Office
Shell Permian - Midland Field Office (343 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Shell Permian - Midland Field Office has more employees than the Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

211111 · TX · Midland

225 Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 359 employers in Midland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EQT Corporation - Pittsburgh 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aera Oaks 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3 and 5 Greenway Plaza 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EQT - Woodcliff 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tyler Area Office 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermon Inc. (San Marcos) Corporate Headquarters 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medtronic - Fort Worth 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE SYGMA San Antonio 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Midland 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Memorial Hospital 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Jobsites 1,716 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProPetro Services, Inc. 1,666 FTE
NAT-TCR Lenovo - Moto (Motorola) 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maryville Sanford Division 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keolis Transit America 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR UTC Aerospace Systems 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4813-48130009-Freeman Expo San Francisco 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE RV Products 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACI-HERZOG A Joint Venture 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACI-Herzog, Joint Venture 343 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.