Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Missouri

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc.

Berkeley, MO · ~39 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc.: 4.2 TCR = 127% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. safety composite

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc.: 2.3 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.4 from 2.3 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Berkeley, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 127% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/19
  • PHOTO Royston Hamilton
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Royston Hamilton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. averages 4.2 TCR (127% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=5.6 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 19 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Missouri.

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc.
Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Shelton Industrial Pattern, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 0.0 0 2 0
2023 5.6 0.0 0 2 0
2022 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2021 7.5 0.0 0 3 0
2020 2.5 0.0 0 1 0
2019 7.3 0.0 1 2 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · MO · Berkeley

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 26 employers in Berkeley, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Royston Hamilton 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ply Gem Industries, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Austin Company 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lochard 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO White Oak 006-0138-WG, WH, WT 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Radiation Protection 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Patheon Biologics LLC 706 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BLV2 453 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - STL9 435 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkeley Service Center 396 FTE
NAT-TCR S05438 - Yavapai Hauling 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S03325 - USA Waste of Oregon - Klamath Falls 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Duralum Products - Sac 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitch's Green Thumb Landscaping Corp. 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE MLC-CORP 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casper 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04015 - Monarch Hill 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04068 - Atascocita Landfill 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.