Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Shenandoah Senior Living

Front Royal, VA · ~25 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shenandoah Senior Living runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Shenandoah Senior Living: 3.9 TCR = 102% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shenandoah Senior Living safety composite

Shenandoah Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shenandoah Senior Living: 0.0 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.51× in 2023

Shenandoah Senior Living's TCR rose 5.8 from 0.0 in 2018 to 5.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Front Royal, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 102% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #42/199
  • PHOTO Villa at Terracina G…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villa at Terracina Grand (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Shenandoah Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shenandoah Senior Living averages 3.9 TCR (102% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shenandoah Senior Living TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.8 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Shenandoah Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Shenandoah Senior Living (25 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Shenandoah Senior Living
Shenandoah Senior Living (25 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Shenandoah Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Front Royal

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 68 employers in Front Royal, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villa at Terracina Grand 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Havelock Manor 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR All American Assisted Living at Raynham 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cape Cod Senior Residences 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowman Orchards, LLc 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle W Farms II, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manufacturing Plant 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowman Fruit Sales LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC203 DC203 FRONT ROYAL VA 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4186-DC203 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Memorial Hospital 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5105 392 FTE
NAT-TCR Weld-On 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1141 BLOOMSBURG, PA 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pregis-Garland 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 300 - Denver Hub Branch 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Courtyard El Paso, TX 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE feed milling and grain handling 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairieland Outpatient Diagnostic Center dBA Digestive Disease Endoscopy Center 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #4283 MERCED, CA 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.