Nursing homes · Ohio

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc

Austintown, OH · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade A.

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc: 1.6 TCR = 25% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc safety composite

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2019→2024

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc injury rate improved

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Austintown, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #65/1074
  • PHOTO Montecito Post-Acutre
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Montecito Post-Acutre (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc averages 1.6 TCR (25% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc TCR series: 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 1074 Nursing homes employers in Ohio.

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc (36 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc
Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc (36 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.1 4.0 1 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Austintown

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 47 employers in Austintown, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Montecito Post-Acutre 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hebrew Home & Hospital 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLEARWATER CENTER 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLEASANT VIEW CARE CENTER 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tremco Barrier Solutions 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peebles Pellet Mill 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gateways Industries 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7272 L&W Supply 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2063 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austintown 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2063 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollywood Gaming Mahoning Valley 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Inland Asphalt Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgan County Community Corrections Annex 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mohican Place 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S03431 - Pinetop - Lakeside Hauling 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chesapeake VA 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eugene Sand Construction 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Larson Oakwood Business Park, LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calumet Dickinson Refining 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.