Support Activities for Air Transportation · Texas

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam)

Sheppard Afb, TX · ~554 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam): 2.9 TCR = 65% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) safety composite

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2018→2023

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) injury rate improved

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam)'s TCR fell 0.6 from 3.4 in 2018 to 2.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.4 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.0 · 2023=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Sheppard Afb, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 65% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #47/101
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~554 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin AFB FL-1107 Luton Dr (3715/3742) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) averages 2.9 TCR (65% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2 · 2023=2.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) falls in its industry

992 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 101 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Texas.

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) (554 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam)
Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) (554 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sheppard Afb, Tx (Sam) has more employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.7 2.1 13 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 10 0 0
2020 2.5 2.3 11 1 0
2019 4.1 2.6 20 0 0
2018 3.4 2.6 14 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · Sheppard Afb

992 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 7 employers in Sheppard Afb, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin AFB FL-1107 Luton Dr (3715/3742) 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - RASM-W Ft Riley 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SNA SANTA ANA JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AIRCRAFT MATERIALS DISTRIBUTION CENTER (KYAMD) 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turner at Pipe Fabrication Paris TX 554 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX_Austin_2433 Rutland Dr._AUSRTL20 554 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knapp Medical Center 554 FTE
STATE-SIZE Company 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR M1 Support Services SAM Sheppard AFB, TX 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106 - SHEPPARD TRAINER MAINTENANCE, TX 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR M1 Support Services STM Sheppard AFB, TX 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106 - SHEPPARD TRAINER MAINTENANCE 90 FTE
NAT-TCR Northeast Asphalt, Inc. - Green Bay 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ANGI Energy 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Airtron Charlotte 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Management of New Orleans, LLC. 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bells Plant 554 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hadco Construction LLC 554 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6727 Lansing 554 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans McKinley 084 554 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.