Auditor's offices, government · Minnesota

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center

Pipestone, MN · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Auditor's offices, government workplace, earning a grade F.

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center: 6.5 TCR = 203% of Auditor's offices, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center safety composite

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center held a steady TCR band

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2020=19.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Pipestone, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 203% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #164/275
  • PHOTO City of Cook
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Cook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center averages 6.5 TCR (203% of the Auditor's offices, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=19.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center falls in its industry

1,496 Auditor's offices, government establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 275 Auditor's offices, government employers in Minnesota.

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center (26 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center
Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center (26 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Sheriff's Office / Law Enforcement Center has fewer employees than the Auditor's offices, government median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 19.4 19.4 1 4 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MN · Pipestone

1,496 Auditor's offices, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 41 employers in Pipestone, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Cook 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peoria Park District 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of La Mirada 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Fleet and Facility Management - 900 E. 103rd St 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Becker 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Silverstreak Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Huiras MN 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Egg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR JBS Swift Pork Company Pipestone 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCMC 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Middle School / High School 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR PIPESTONE SWIFT PORK COMPANY 127 FTE
NAT-TCR Hazleton 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Knapheide Truck Equipment Company 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dry Harbor Nursing Home 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Culinary-Avon 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anna Trucking, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Elmwood Park Fire Department 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electrical Engineering and Equipment Co (Pc4426) 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE CED Greentech (PC1875) 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.