Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats · Oregon

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4

Roseburg, OR · ~176 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats workplace, earning a grade D.

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4: 5.0 TCR = 148% of Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 safety composite

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4: 3.2 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.99× in 2018

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4's TCR rose 3.6 from 3.2 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 148% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #203/591
  • PHOTO Lowes Foods #235
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lowes Foods #235 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 averages 5.0 TCR (148% of the Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2018=6.8 · BLS 3.4

Where Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 falls in its industry

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retail establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #203 safest of 591 Delicatessens primarily retail employers in Oregon.

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 (176 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4
Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 (176 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Sherm's Thunderbird Market Inc #4 has more employees than the Delicatessens primarily retailing a rang median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.8 5.0 11 0 0
2016 3.2 2.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · OR · Roseburg

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lowes Foods #235 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 1238 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10147 Fort Collins 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 035-00560 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moore Excavation Inc. 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE TP Grants Pass LLC 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brentwood Corporation 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE QuantumClean - Hillsboro 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant One 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vern Eide GM 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3014 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hialeah (Flhia) 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oxford Health and Rehab Center 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Senior Health-Treasure Isle, LLC 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Variform Inc. dba Ply Gem Siding Group 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Ridge Rehab Center, LLC 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.