Stamping Blanking of metal parts for automotive · Kentucky

Shiloh Bowling Green

Bowling Green, KY · ~62 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shiloh Bowling Green runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Stamping Blanking of metal parts for automotive workplace, earning a grade A.

Shiloh Bowling Green: 2.0 TCR = 36% of Stamping Blanking of metal parts for automotive BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shiloh Bowling Green safety composite

Shiloh Bowling Green scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2021

Shiloh Bowling Green injury rate improved

Shiloh Bowling Green's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Bowling Green, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/31
  • PHOTO FINDLAY PRODUCTS CORP.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FINDLAY PRODUCTS CORP. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Shiloh Bowling Green in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shiloh Bowling Green averages 2.0 TCR (36% of the Stamping Blanking of metal parts for automotive BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shiloh Bowling Green TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 5.4

Where Shiloh Bowling Green falls in its industry

510 Stamping Blanking of metal par establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 31 Stamping Blanking of metal par employers in Kentucky.

Shiloh Bowling Green (62 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Shiloh Bowling Green
Shiloh Bowling Green (62 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Shiloh Bowling Green has fewer employees than the Stamping Blanking of metal parts for aut median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.8 1.4 4 0 0
2017 4.4 2.9 3 0 0
2016 1.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · KY · Bowling Green

510 Stamping Blanking of metal parts for automotive employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FINDLAY PRODUCTS CORP. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shiloh Industries LLC Goshen 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pridgeon & Clay, Inc. R&D Center 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trenton Pressing, LLC. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pineville 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terra Apartment Homes 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips Brothers Construction 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berkel Piling Louisville 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR HYA 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Merles Automotive DC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ala - Arizona 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at St. Catherine Hospital - Hskp 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tecta-America Zero Company Cincinnati 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graduate Cincinnati 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graduate Oxford 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graduate Richmond 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.