Metal stamping and welding of automotive parts · Tennessee

Shiloh Dickson

Dickson, TN · ~185 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shiloh Dickson runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Metal stamping and welding of automotive parts workplace, earning a grade A.

Shiloh Dickson: 2.2 TCR = 41% of Metal stamping and welding of automotive parts BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shiloh Dickson safety composite

Shiloh Dickson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2021

Shiloh Dickson injury rate improved

Shiloh Dickson's TCR fell 3.5 from 4.6 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Dickson, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/39
  • PHOTO Thai Summit Kentucky…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~185 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thai Summit Kentucky Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Shiloh Dickson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shiloh Dickson averages 2.2 TCR (41% of the Metal stamping and welding of automotive parts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shiloh Dickson TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=1 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=1.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Shiloh Dickson falls in its industry

510 Metal stamping and welding of establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 39 Metal stamping and welding of employers in Tennessee.

Shiloh Dickson (185 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Shiloh Dickson
Shiloh Dickson (185 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Shiloh Dickson has more employees than the Metal stamping and welding of automotive median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2018 2.4 1.8 4 0 0
2017 1.0 0.3 3 0 0
2016 4.6 2.4 14 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · TN · Dickson

510 Metal stamping and welding of automotive parts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 73 employers in Dickson, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thai Summit Kentucky Corporation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower Automotive Operation USA, LLC - Bardstown 1 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Auburn 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shiloh Industries LLC Valley City 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Multi-Color Corporation - Clarksville 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tinplate 024 Chestnut Hill 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleveland Manufacturing : Cleveland, TN 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE TI Group Automotive Systems - Greeneville 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dickson County Board of Education 1,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Horizon Medical Center 773 FTE
CITY-NEAR Express Employment Professonals 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dickson County Government 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Harper - Lake Mary 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Onecbi LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield Processing- ST. Louis, MO 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR BEST Contracting Services Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cutrale Citrus Leesburg 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chamberlin Austin, LLC 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Phoenix Children'S Hosp-Food 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookhaven Center for Rehjab and Nursing 185 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.